
Originally Posted by
markjfixit
I am not a judge or jury but of course I have an opinion. there are several things that are sketchy about it being there seems to be the only one witness that was in fact extremely drunk and facing murder charges.it seems strange that first off the sheepherder hit this man with a bottle in the head and yet it does not state if there were injuries to the guy getting hit in the head?? second sounds like the sheepherder was driving back and forth in front of this guys house and the shots from the 45 came from the porch?? and third after the man crashed into the ditch the man aproached him and fired the rifle killing him instantly as they stated he dropped didnt crawl or walk. in my opinion it would be second degree murder. first degree is planning a murder. second degree is just plain killing at moments notice unpremeditated. and to make it worse the victim was unarmed both being shot at in the truck from the porch to the road is not self defence, then changing guns and shooting from the other side shows intent rather than defence. when the herder took off in his truck after hitting him he should have called the police that herder would have been charged with assult and stealing the truck instead took out weapons which ultimitely drove the stakes way up!! they had unresolved issues from the year before and it all seemed to come to a head with a terrible abuse of each other and firearms. I feel sad for both parties having destroyed there lives in a drunk state of mind,, very sad!!