biggest person not to trust on this site

[esmordan]

stakes are NOT supposed to be paid back look up the definition of one then talk pana

[esmordan]

Staking a Tournament Poker Player
I pay 100% of your entry fee to a tournament. You pay me 50% of whatever you win in the tournament.

I pay 50% of your entry fee to a tournament. You pay me 25% of your winnings for that tournament.

A popular system of staking among professional poker players is to buy a piece of many players in a big tournament. A backer may pay 10% of the entry cost for 10 different players, securing a 5% stake in each of their winnings.

[PANAMHIEST]

The terms are not set in stone and can be determined by the staker. If the staker says I want the buy-in back, then that is the term. If the staker does a 50-50 proposal, in which the player pays 50% of his winnings to the staker, then that is the terms.

There are alot of different types of stakes, and what you havent seem to follow is you didnt follow your terms. Terp said lets play a game together, you didnt, and when ask for the 10 bucks, wouldnt it seem obvious that the term was to give the buy-in back?

I suggest you read the theory of staking in a well known book called " The Professional, The Banker, And The Suicide King" written by Micheal Craig.

Here is a link to it if you would like

The Professor, the Banker, and the Suicide King - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia