Discussion of the Week: Euthanasia

[Pokerkitty6]

Only the strong survive...

[navuta]

also in poker... only the strong the luck survive..
...
See you at the tables...lol...
I agree with Eutanasia... People jump off the bridges and nobody cares...why would they care if u whant to die in peace on your bed???
I really don get it..
Have u seen that movie? bridges????
nice one...

[targetguy1]

Dr. Jack Kevorkian is the first thing that comes to mind when i read the this thread. There are so many differen types of euthanasia. I for one say leave it up to the person that is suffering. Give them the drugs they need and let them do it if they want. I understand it could be considered it suicide but if this something that really want then they should do it to themselves instead of having help.

I dont agree with people helping other commit this. i consider that to be muder. I understand they give them permission to do it but still i think if the person really want to stop suffering and die then they will end their life on there on. They dont need help or assistance killing themself. By letting doctors get away with this we are letting them act as if they were god. They are not god and just humans like we all are. A doctor that is involed in such action shuld be held respondsible for his or her actions. Doctor are supposed to help heal the body not shut it down.

Anyways i am not for this but if the person insist that it must be done then let them kill themselves and not have any help a for i see that as muder.

[PANAMHIEST]

I dont really have any views on this subject. I think if a person is in a state

of mind where dying is better than trying to live, and they have sufficient

medical evidence to back that up, then if they want to end it, so be it. The

grand ol government lethally injects perfectly healthy criminals convicted of

crimes everyday, or almost everyday. They(government) are just a bunch of

hypocrits when it comes to this subject, and the fact is they would rather

see a terminally/medically person suffer than go peacefully, as opposed to

letting a caged criminal legally die peacefully, instead of letting them suffer

from their crimes. This doesnt really makes alot of sense does it? I may go off

the subject a little here, and go so far as to say that the government makes

it perfectly legal to kill a innocent little baby in the state of texas as long as

the child hasnt reach the 6 month term yet. The child has a heart beat,

he/her can laugh smile or cry, is usually perfectly healthy, but yet this is

legal. Does that make sense? Where is the justice in that? what happened to

morals? does anyone even give a f@#k?