Is Nature the answer?

[thejuanupsman]

ok from a biological point of view with the whole natural thing. I belive that every person has reproductive organs. These organs are made for us to reproduce. I think that the human species have intention to reproduce like most organisms. I do know that it takes a relationship for reproducing and that relationship is hetero sexual. So this is why I belive that the people were desighned naturaly to be heterosexual. Homosexuality relationships cannot and never will be able to reproduce right? To me this means that in nature the intended realationship for us is hetorosexual not vise versa. It just seems logical to me and not to unreasonable. I know that a persons sexual style is there choice ok. I dont belive either that they dont have rights and it is wrong or immoral in anyway but it is unnatural. We beside dophins are the only animals that have sex for plessure do you ever see animals of the same sex pleaseuring each other? Tell me this animal and ill shut up. Why cant homosexuals just be good friends. Maybe homo sexuality is gods birth control or something. In nature the majority seems to always take over and the rest have to fight to survive. It is a hurdle in life for humans to go threw the whole social process. Some how we get molded because of this assimilation and intellectual construction.

The last thing im going to say about this subject is that I belive that nature is the answere to our survival but nobody should be condemned for being attracted to one another. Its not there fault that they where social influenced in this way.

There are many facets of natural behavior that fall outside the realm of reproduction. If you are going to limit the natural to the reproductive then you can eliminate a significant portion of animal behavior as unnatural. At that point the word loses it's meaning doesn't it? If you mean conducive to reproduction then say that. But if it happens in the natural world (and any farm boy can tell you it does) then it's natural.