Regarding Myself

[nodepositneeded]

You said this.

"If you post, and occasionally have some interesting or intellectual or even just fairly decent responses, you will get reputation. The reason for negative rep is the opposite, things which are detrimental.

The idea of this is to reward members who contribute and stay on the forum and post."

But then said this.

"But this only started today and so far i have given reputation to one person. They deserved it IMO as it was possibly the most amusing post of the week for me."


so it's confusing to see what you find appropriate for positive rep therefore I do not think you should have rep responsibility.

So how does something amusing contribute to this site in a plus rep qualified manner because just because it was funny to you doesn't mean to everyone it was, therefore it's wrong to rep positive just because you laughed at something.

Kaci - I asked eejit101 to help me with the reputation system. I kindly ask that you respect my decision. This is a brand new system so it is FAR too early to make assumptions about how it will work.

[nodepositneeded]

As a follow up to that last post -

If eejit101 wasn't willing to give me a hand with the reputation system, it's very likely that I would have to get rid of the chips system altogether.

I'm grateful for his help because without him it may not be possible to continue with this unique system!