Regarding Myself

[eejit101]

Ok, but im gonna argue it.

I have never once edited or deleted naything of yours that wasnt warranted. If i had id know about it.

I can affect someones rep level that is true. I will not do it on a whim. I shall negative rep a post if i feel it is needed. I hope that occurance shall never arise.

If you feel it is unfair please link a post you feel is meaningless crap and posted somewhere where it doesnt belong and ill happily comment on it.

And im struggling to think of your last post i can actually +rep for you....

The idea of this is to reward members who contribute and stay on the forum and post.

If you post, and occasionally have some interesting or intellectual or even just fairly decent responses, you will get reputation. The reason for negative rep is the opposite, things which are detrimental.

From what i can see you have recieved no rep of any kind yet. But this only started today and so far i have given reputation to one person. They deserved it IMO as it was possibly the most amusing post of the week for me. I have obviously been trusted in being able to give reputation fairly, and thats what i intend to do.


Just because you havent recieved any yet, or because you may have a personal issue with something, does not mean i am vindicating you in any way.

[KaciBlakely]

Ok, but im gonna argue it.

I have never once edited or deleted naything of yours that wasnt warranted. If i had id know about it.

I can affect someones rep level that is true. I will not do it on a whim. I shall negative rep a post if i feel it is needed. I hope that occurance shall never arise.

If you feel it is unfair please link a post you feel is meaningless crap and posted somewhere where it doesnt belong and ill happily comment on it.

And im struggling to think of your last post i can actually +rep for you....

The idea of this is to reward members who contribute and stay on the forum and post.

If you post, and occasionally have some interesting or intellectual or even just fairly decent responses, you will get reputation. The reason for negative rep is the opposite, things which are detrimental.

From what i can see you have recieved no rep of any kind yet. But this only started today and so far i have given reputation to one person. They deserved it IMO as it was possibly the most amusing post of the week for me. I have obviously been trusted in being able to give reputation fairly, and thats what i intend to do.


Just because you havent recieved any yet, or because you may have a personal issue with something, does not mean i am vindicating you in any way.

You said this.

"If you post, and occasionally have some interesting or intellectual or even just fairly decent responses, you will get reputation. The reason for negative rep is the opposite, things which are detrimental.

The idea of this is to reward members who contribute and stay on the forum and post."

But then said this.

"But this only started today and so far i have given reputation to one person. They deserved it IMO as it was possibly the most amusing post of the week for me."


so it's confusing to see what you find appropriate for positive rep therefore I do not think you should have rep responsibility.

So how does something amusing contribute to this site in a plus rep qualified manner because just because it was funny to you doesn't mean to everyone it was, therefore it's wrong to rep positive just because you laughed at something.

[freeringo]

I promise to always try to amuse.
If I fail to do so, please take double the rep points from me.
That's how serious I take my comedy.

[eejit101]

You said this.

"If you post, and occasionally have some interesting or intellectual or even just fairly decent responses, you will get reputation. The reason for negative rep is the opposite, things which are detrimental.

The idea of this is to reward members who contribute and stay on the forum and post."

But then said this.

"But this only started today and so far i have given reputation to one person. They deserved it IMO as it was possibly the most amusing post of the week for me."


so it's confusing to see what you find appropriate for positive rep therefore I do not think you should have rep responsibility.

So how does something amusing contribute to this site in a plus rep qualified manner because just because it was funny to you doesn't mean to everyone it was, therefore it's wrong to rep positive just because you laughed at something.

Didnt read my "how to quote peices of an atricle thread then huh

What i find appropraite to give rep to, and take rep away from, is exactly the same as what NDN does. I dont need to justify this, but i will. While he will stricly do the casino section, we will both do the main forum.

For information as to what we will be repping, please read the appropraite thread.

If you have issues, please PM NDN, or...

Email NDN - support@nodepositneeded.com

Or email me - idontcare@ivegivenup.com

[freeringo]

Didnt read my "how to quote peices of an atricle thread then huh

What i find appropraite to give rep to, and take rep away from, is exactly the same as what NDN does. I dont need to justify this, but i will. While he will stricly do the casino section, we will both do the main forum.

For information as to what we will be repping, please read the appropraite thread.

If you have issues, please PM NDN, or...

Email NDN - support@nodepositneeded.com

Or email me - idontcare@ivegivenup.com

This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.

Delivery to the following recipients failed.

idontcare@ivegivenup.com

[nodepositneeded]

You said this.

"If you post, and occasionally have some interesting or intellectual or even just fairly decent responses, you will get reputation. The reason for negative rep is the opposite, things which are detrimental.

The idea of this is to reward members who contribute and stay on the forum and post."

But then said this.

"But this only started today and so far i have given reputation to one person. They deserved it IMO as it was possibly the most amusing post of the week for me."


so it's confusing to see what you find appropriate for positive rep therefore I do not think you should have rep responsibility.

So how does something amusing contribute to this site in a plus rep qualified manner because just because it was funny to you doesn't mean to everyone it was, therefore it's wrong to rep positive just because you laughed at something.

Kaci - I asked eejit101 to help me with the reputation system. I kindly ask that you respect my decision. This is a brand new system so it is FAR too early to make assumptions about how it will work.

[nodepositneeded]

As a follow up to that last post -

If eejit101 wasn't willing to give me a hand with the reputation system, it's very likely that I would have to get rid of the chips system altogether.

I'm grateful for his help because without him it may not be possible to continue with this unique system!