
No Deposit Casino |
No Deposit Bonus |
Bonus Code |
First Deposit Bonus |
USA Players Accepted |
$31 |
NDN31 |
200% up to $7777 |
Yes |
|
$10 |
UPTOWN10 |
250% up to $8,888 |
Yes |
|
$127 |
NDN127 |
400% up to $4,000 |
Yes |
|
$1,500 |
No Code Needed |
100% up to $200 |
No |
|
$175 |
NDN175 |
100% up to $11,000 |
Yes |
|
$100 |
100NEW |
250% up to $7000 |
Yes |
judging from past post and feed back , this post will either gain you more rep. points or lose you more rep. points than in the past.. it's almost a gimmy that you won't stay where you are..6. Reputation can be taken away for any post that does not contribute something to the forum.
I have a difficult time with a monarchy ruling system.
Since there is only NDN and Eejit to judge us, there is no quorum.
What if a dispute arises and a quorum is needed?
Does the Brown act apply to said forum rules?
If our peers can deduct points for undesirable posts, then who really are our role models?
Eejit has been known to post words that have not contributed anything, as well as many of us at times.
Can we now expect our new ruling class to set a new example of excellence?
Or will anarchy ensue when one person loses points, while another more favorable member does not for the same rule violations?
I appeal to our King to allow a non bias member to help settle disputes by creating a quorum and possibly casting the deciding vote on the fate of a fellow member.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Disclaimer: This website is an informational site and should be used for informational purposes only. We pride ourselves on having the most up to date information but cannot guarantee 100% accuracy. Please check your local laws regarding online gambling to ensure that you are in compliance with the laws of your jurisdiction. Gambling can be addictive, please play responsibly.




Reply With Quote