Originally Posted by
freeringo
6. Reputation can be taken away for any post that does not contribute something to the forum.
I have a difficult time with a monarchy ruling system.
Since there is only NDN and Eejit to judge us, there is no quorum.
What if a dispute arises and a quorum is needed?
Does the Brown act apply to said forum rules?
If our peers can deduct points for undesirable posts, then who really are our role models?
Eejit has been known to post words that have not contributed anything, as well as many of us at times.
Can we now expect our new ruling class to set a new example of excellence?
Or will anarchy ensue when one person loses points, while another more favorable member does not for the same rule violations?
I appeal to our King to allow a non bias member to help settle disputes by creating a quorum and possibly casting the deciding vote on the fate of a fellow member.
